Survey Gyanvapi Mosque adjacent to Kashi Vishwanath Temple: Varanasi court

Type 5-member panel, with two individuals from minority neighborhood, for the duty, it directs ASI. Sunni Central Waqf Board to problem order

An area courtroom in Varanasi on Thursday directed the Archaeological Survey of India to conduct a survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque compound adjoining to the Kashi Vishwanath Temple to seek out out whether or not it was a “superimposition, alteration or addition or there may be structural overlapping of any variety, with or over, some other spiritual construction”.

The U.P. Sunni Central Waqf Board mentioned it could problem the order within the Allahabad Excessive Court docket, terming it ‘unwarranted’.

The courtroom additionally directed the DG of the ASI to represent a five-member committee of consultants and people effectively versed in science of archaeology, two out of whom ought to ideally belong to the minority neighborhood.

The committee would “hint as as to whether any Hindu temple ever existed earlier than the mosque in query was constructed or superimposed or added upon on the disputed website,” mentioned senior civil decide quick observe courtroom Ashutosh Tiwari in his order seen by The Hindu.

The courtroom mentioned the committee could be entitled to enter each portion of the spiritual construction located on the disputed website however shall first resort to solely Floor Penetrating Radar or Geo-Radiology System or each to fulfill itself whether or not any excavation or extraction work is required at any portion of the spiritual construction.

If excavation or extraction is to be performed at any portion of the construction, it needs to be first performed by trial trench technique vertically and that too at a really small scale and less than 4 sq. toes at a time, the courtroom mentioned.

The order got here on a petition demanding the restoration of the land on which the mosque stands to the Hindus claiming that Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb had pulled down elements of the previous Kashi Vishwanath Temple to construct the mosque.

The DG of the ASI is directed to get a complete archaeological bodily survey be performed of your entire settlement plot no 9130 situated at Mauja Shahar Khas, Pargana Dehat Amanat, together with the Naubat Khana of the northern gate of the Gyanvapi compound and the home in direction of the northern gate of the naubatkhana, the courtroom mentioned.

“The prime function of the archaeological survey shall be to seek out out as as to whether the spiritual construction standing at current on the disputed website is a superimposition, alteration or addition or there may be structural overlapping of any variety, with or over, some other spiritual construction,” the decide mentioned.

The committee has additionally been tasked to organize a complete documentation together with the drawing, plan, elevation website map with exact breadth and width of the disputed website marked with hatched strains within the plaint map.

The courtroom additionally requested the ASI to nominate an skilled as an observer for the committee, ideally a scholarly persona and established academician of any central college.

The fee and bills of your entire survey could be borne by the ASI.

Sayid Yasin, joint secretary of the Anjuma Intejamia Masajid, caretaker of the masjid, was disenchanted with the order. “We had hoped that after the Babri Masjid case, now there could be peace. However it looks as if the courts and people in energy are not looking for that,” he informed The Hindu.

Sunni Central Waqf Board chairperson Zufar Faruqi mentioned: “Our understanding is obvious that this case is barred by the Locations of Worship (Particular Provisions) Act, 1991. The Locations of Worship Act was upheld by a 5-judge Structure Bench of the Supreme Court docket within the Ayodhya judgment. The standing of Gyanvapi Masjid is, as such, past query.

“Even in any other case, we are able to say as per authorized recommendation that the order of survey is questionable as a result of technical proof can solely complement sure foundational information.”

No proof has been produced earlier than the courtroom that implies that there was a previous present temple on the website of the mosque, he mentioned.

Even within the Ayodhya judgment, the ASI excavation was in the end of no use, he mentioned. “The ASI didn’t discover proof that the Babri Masjid was constructed upon demolition of a temple,” he mentioned.

Scroll to Top