Alarm in Kashmir as government sacks three employees, citing ‘security of the state’

On April 21, the Jammu and Kashmir authorities led by Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha ordered the structure of a Particular Process Pressure to take actions below Article 311(2)(C) of the Structure of India.

Article 311(2) of the Structure disallows any public servant’s removing from service with out an inquiry and an inexpensive alternative of being heard. Nevertheless, the sub-clause (C) of the availability (2) of the article states that if the President or the Governor is happy that an enquiry shouldn’t be required within the curiosity of the safety of the state, it isn’t necessary. Due to this fact, a public servant might be terminated from the companies with none inquiry.

9 days after the Particular Process Pressure was constituted, the Lieutenant Governor ordered the termination of three authorities workers from Kashmir: a faculty instructor Idrees Jan from Kupwara, an assistant professor Abdul Bari Naik from Kulgam and a naib tehsildar Nazir Ahmad Wani from Pulwama district.

The termination orders cited Article 311(2)(C) of the Structure and stated the Lieutenant Governor was happy that “within the curiosity of the safety of the State, it isn’t expedient to carry an enquiry”. No additional clarification was given, neither have been any lapses or misconduct on the a part of the terminated workers spelt out.

Idrees Jan, the college instructor, stated he was knowledgeable about his sacking within the presence of the police. The 39-year-old, who joined authorities service in 2007, stated he was shocked. “Earlier than the Covid lockdown, I had attended to my obligation very usually,” he stated.

A resident of Dardpora village in Kupwara, Jan is a father of three youngsters and the only incomes member within the household. Had he been terminated from his service following a “correct enquiry” and after being proven “proof of his misconduct”, Jan stated he would have had no regrets. “However this order feels as if somebody has slit my throat for no motive.”

The opposite two workers – Naik and Wani – are presently in jail, going through costs in a number of felony instances. Neither has been convicted.

Naik, a 40-year-old assistant professor of geography, was arrested on March 7. The police had stated he had been evading arrest in three instances registered towards him in 2018 and 2019, two of them below the stringent Illegal Actions Prevention Act. However an investigation by discovered he had commonly attended official duties, together with operating a Covid-19 quarantine facility, a job which concerned shut coordination with the police. His household maintained that he had been arrested due to his activism that had unearthed corruption and unlawful sand mining within the space.

With Naik’s bail utility nonetheless pending earlier than a neighborhood courtroom, the termination order has come as a shock to the household. They really feel the union territory administration has been misled by “some components” about Naik. “Earlier than going to the courtroom to problem his termination, we’re considering of creating a illustration earlier than the Honorable Lieutenant Governor to apprise him in regards to the information,” stated his brother, Abdul Rouf.

Workers below scanner

The orders have triggered alarm and nervousness in Jammu and Kashmir, the place the federal government is the largest employer with a workforce of 4.5 lakh folks.

“The termination of workers with out giving them an opportunity to be heard is towards the spirit of legislation and the structure of the nation,” stated Mohammad Rafique Quite, president of the Jammu and Kashmir Workers Joint Motion Committee, in an announcement on Might 4. “This transfer has unfold panic among the many workers who usually are not solely burdened but additionally overburdened.”

A authorities worker in Srinagar, who didn’t need to be recognized, stated he noticed the termination orders as a message that “anybody might be sacked with none motive”. He identified that “within the curiosity of the safety of the state” was a imprecise assertion.

“The query is an worker doesn’t know what constitutes a mistake within the eyes of the federal government since there isn’t a transparency,” he stated.

Many see the sackings as a part of the Centre-led union territory authorities’s makes an attempt to exert better management over authorities workers.

In October, Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha amended Article 226 (2) of the Jammu and Kashmir Civil Service Laws, which made it necessary for presidency workers to bear a efficiency appraisal after finishing 22 years of service, or reaching the age of 48. If their efficiency was discovered unsatisfactory, the federal government had the facility to make them take untimely retirement within the public curiosity.

Simply over a month after the amendments have been put in impact, the federal government introduced the primary untimely retirement: Fayaz Ahmad Siraj, an worker of the Jammu and Kashmir Board of Faculty Schooling, who had accomplished 27 years of service on October 14, was requested to go away.

Then in February, the Jammu and Kashmir authorities issued an “pressing” order, asking the deputy commissioners of ten districts in Kashmir Valley to submit particulars of all workers who would full 22 years of service or attain the age of 48 by December 2021. Moreover the fundamental job-related particulars of the staff, the order additionally sought details about their involvement in political exercise or in instances of legislation and order together with militancy and stone-throwing incidents.

The federal government additionally widened the scrutiny of freshly appointed public servants in Jammu and Kashmir. On March 3, it issued orders to say that no new worker can be paid their wage or allowances till that they had undergone a verification course of by the Legal Investigation Division, the premier intelligence company of Jammu and Kashmir Police. Whereas the verification course of was not new, what was totally different was that the brand new entrants have been requested to submit particulars about their social media accounts like Twitter, Fb and Instagram.

‘Time-consuming course of’

Whereas the current amendments have sparked concern amongst authorities workers, abstract dismissals usually are not a brand new phenomenon in Jammu and Kashmir.

In 1986, Governor Jagmohan Malhotra had sacked plenty of authorities workers for his or her “anti-national” actions. Throughout the armed rebellion within the 1990s, 5 senior bureaucrats working have been sacked by Governor Girish Chandra Saxena for being “a risk to the safety, sovereignty and integrity of India”.

Extra not too long ago, in 2016, when Kashmir was aflame after the killing of militant chief Burhan Wani, the Mehbooba Mufti-led Peoples Democratic Social gathering and Bharatiya Janata Social gathering alliance authorities terminated at the very least 12 authorities workers for his or her “anti-national” actions. The termination was invoked by Article 126 of the Structure of Jammu and Kashmir, a provision nearly much like the Article 311 of the Indian Structure now relevant to the union territory after the scrapping of its particular standing on August 5, 2019.

Specialists say the terminated workers must strategy the Central Administrative Tribunal to problem the federal government’s motion. Earlier, all of the service-related issues or disputes have been heard by the Jammu and Kashmir Excessive Court docket. However after the dismantling of the state, the Central authorities constituted a separate Central Administrative Tribunal bench at Jammu for the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh in Might 2020. Round 40,000 service-related instances pending earlier than the excessive courtroom have been transferred to the tribunal.

Attorneys coping with service-related issues assert that the method earlier than the tribunal is something however speedy. “Once they [the three terminated employees] file a case earlier than the tribunal, it gained’t be solved in 24 hours. The time-consuming course of is killing,” stated advocate Zafar Shah, a senior lawyer in Srinagar.

In response to Shah, there are three broad classes of terminations of presidency workers in Jammu and Kashmir. Firstly, untimely retirement ordered by the federal government after an worker has achieved a sure age or sure years of service. The second kind of termination comes on the idea of an inquiry indicting an worker and the third one includes sacking of an worker with out an inquiry within the curiosity of the “safety of the state”.

It’s the third one which is probably the trickiest and skewed towards an worker. “In issues associated to safety of state, the federal government can’t make the explanations behind an worker’s termination public because the safety of state is a confidential matter,” Shah stated. “But when an worker challenges his termination within the courtroom, the federal government has accountability there and it has to justify its motion.”

This nonetheless does make the method clear. “Even when the federal government submits a file of causes, which of their view make the worker a risk to the safety of the state, it may be solely seen by a decide and never the petitioner,” Shah defined.

Scroll to Top